University of Iowa Campus Ministry Upheld in Federal Court
(Madison, WI)–An Iowa federal judge has ruled that the University of Iowa and its officers violated the law when they kicked ñ off campus for asking its leaders to be Christian. A dozen other religious groups—including Sikhs, Muslims, and Latter-day Saints—were also kicked off campus for requiring their leaders to share their faith. But all secular groups and a few religious groups favored by the University got a pass.
, the court held that this discrimination was so egregious that the officers involved would be personally accountable for any money ñ lost fighting to stay on campus. The court left open the possibility that the University’s president, Bruce Harreld, could also be found liable.
ñ has been at the University of Iowa for over 25 years. It welcomes all students as members, and only requires the students who lead its ministry affirm its faith. In the past, the University has honored ñ for its contributions to campus life. But in June 2018, the University claimed that, by requiring leaders to affirm their faith, ñ was violating the University’s nondiscrimination policy.
The University then limited ñ’s access to campus, froze its bank account, shut down its website, and advertised that it was “defunct” for lack of student interest. As a result, ñ suffered its sharpest membership decline in over twenty years. The federal court’s ruling confirmed that the University’s actions violated the Constitution and ordered the University to respect ñ’s right to select religious leaders going forward.
“We must have leaders who share our faith,” said Greg Jao, ñ’s Director of External Relations. “No group—religious or secular—could survive with leaders who reject its values. We’re grateful the court has stopped the University’s religious discrimination, and we look forward to continuing our ministry on campus for years to come.”
ñ USA is on 772 campuses nationwide. Its University of Iowa chapter hosts weekly Bible studies and monthly meetings for prayer, worship, and religious discussions on current issues.
In upholding the group’s right to be on campus, the court noted that, just last January—in the related case of —it already warned the University against enforcing its policy unevenly. The court it “would never have expected the University to respond to that order by homing in on religious groups[]” like ñ, while “carving out explicit exemptions for other groups. But here we are.” The court did “not know how a reasonable person could have concluded this was acceptable,” since it “plainly” doubled down on the exact same conduct the court had already held unlawful. In a last week, the court described the University’s conduct as “ludicrous” and “incredibly baffling.”
ñ was represented in this case by the . For more information or to arrange an interview with a Becket attorney, contact Ryan Colby at media@becketlaw.org or 202-349-7219.